Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Diabetol ; 57(7): 835-842, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32100106

RESUMO

AIMS: A sliding-scale (SS) regimen is discouraged to correct hyperglycemia in hospital patients, but there is resistance to adoption of basal-bolus (BB) treatment in surgical units. We tested the feasibility and the effects of a nurse-based BB regimen in orthopedic surgery. METHODS: Following an intense training to implement a protocol amenable by nurses, a group of patients admitted with hyperglycemia in an orthopedic institute were prospectively followed according to a basal-bolus insulin regimen (BB, n = 80). They were compared with a hyperglycemic group eventually treated by sliding-scale insulin on demand (SS, n = 122). Diabetes was present in 196 cases. Metabolic control was assessed during the first 3 days of surgery; outcome data were tested by logistic regression, after adjusting for propensity score. RESULT: Average blood glucose and glucose variability were lower in BB versus SS (P < 0.001), in the presence of similar 3-day insulin doses. Complications were recorded in 68 cases (16.2% vs. 45.1% in BB and SS, respectively). BB regimen was associated with propensity-adjusted reduction in all adverse events [odds ratio (OR) 0.36; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.76] and of systemic infections (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.07-0.50) and with shorter hospital stay (8.8 ± SD 5.2 days vs. 12.5 ± 7.4; P < 0.01). The superiority of BB regimen was confirmed in the pair-matched analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The study proves the feasibility and the superiority of nurse-based BB versus SS treatment in metabolic control and on the risk of adverse events in orthopedic surgery patients with hyperglycemia.


Assuntos
Hiperglicemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hiperglicemia/enfermagem , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/enfermagem , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/enfermagem , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Glicemia/metabolismo , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/enfermagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/sangue , Hiperglicemia/complicações , Pacientes Internados , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/sangue , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/complicações , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/enfermagem , Admissão do Paciente , Pontuação de Propensão
2.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 135(10): 1405-10, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26141535

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction requires an intensive rehabilitation program to be completely successful. Cryotherapy has been described to be helpful in reducing post-operative pain and edema. Aim of this prospective randomized study is to compare two homogeneous groups of patients, one receiving traditional icing regimen and the other a temperature-controlled continuous cold flow device, in post-operative setting after ACL reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients treated for ACL reconstruction using "over the top" technique were enrolled for this study. All patients received the same elastocompressive bandage. Regarding the coolant device, 23 patients were randomized to temperature-controlled continuous cold flow device (Hilotherm® group) and 24 patients were randomized to receive ice bag (control group). The two groups were homogenous for pre-operative (age, sex, and time "lesion to surgery") and intra-operative parameters (duration of the procedure, meniscectomy, and chondral damage). NRS (numeric rating scale), blood loss, knee volume increase at three established sites, ROM, and pain killers consumption were assessed. The subjective evaluation of the device including practicality and usefulness of the device was investigated. RESULTS: Hilotherm group resulted in lower pain perception (NRS), blood loss, knee volume increase at the patellar apex and 10 cm proximal to the superior patellar pole, and higher range of motion (p < 0.05) in the first post-operative day. No difference in pain killers consumption was noted. Hilotherm device was considered "comfortable" and "useful" by the majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hilotherm group showed significant better results in first post-operative day. Further studies with higher number of patients and longer follow-up are required to assess the beneficial effects on rehabilitation and the cost-effectiveness of the routinely use of this device. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.


Assuntos
Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Hipotermia Induzida/instrumentação , Traumatismos do Joelho/cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Temperatura Baixa , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Traumatismos do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Temperatura , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...